Control and evidence review
Compare policies and operating records against control criteria; flag missing or conflicting evidence with source references.
What stays with your teamReview templates and findings with named owners.
Practice 02Responsible AI Workflows for GRC Teams
Let’s build AI-supported document review, evidence and follow-up workflows with your governance, risk and compliance team.
Start with one process. Put source verification, human approval and decision records into everyday work.
For your team's daily work
Five workflows. Tangible deliverables.
Regulatory change and action tracking
Map changes in selected sources to affected processes and track actions approved by the compliance team.
What stays with your teamImpact-review templates and an action list.
Supplier review
Review gaps across questionnaires, contracts and security documents; record open issues and acceptance conditions.
What stays with your teamSourced review files and follow-up dates.
Findings and exceptions
Track owners, deadlines and closure evidence; keep risk acceptance and closure approval with authorised people.
What stays with your teamA findings workflow and closure criteria.
Committee and management reporting
Prepare sourced drafts from risk and control records, highlighting matters that need a decision.
What stays with your teamReport templates and decision tracking.
How we work together
From a selected process to a workflow your team can use.
- 01
Select the process and assess risk
Review workload, data flows and existing controls; agree the pilot boundaries.
What stays with your teamA priority process and pilot plan.
- 02
Prepare the team and controls
Practise with real examples; define data access, verification steps and approval authority.
What stays with your teamTeam practice and control templates.
- 03
Test the pilot together
Test source accuracy, missed findings, confidentiality and total review time using real documents.
What stays with your teamTest findings and operating procedures.
- 04
Hand over and review
Name an operating owner and agree update triggers and regular reviews.
What stays with your teamWorkflow documentation and a review cycle.
Illustrative pilot: supplier review
Approved documents → sourced review draft → expert verification → authorised decision → open-issue tracking.
AI extracts relevant passages and flags missing evidence. An authorised person decides acceptance, conditions or rejection. We agree source accuracy, error, confidentiality and timing criteria before testing.
What do we need to start?
A process owner, approved sample documents and a small user group. We agree technical connections and automation separately with your technology team or delivery partner.
Let’s choose your first workflow.
Control review, regulatory monitoring or findings management: start with the work that takes most of your team's time.
Plan a pilot for your team →